wing chun is about harmony and zen bushism, not being an asshole or giving the finger. You will not understand it until you understand this.
OK. I'll admit the posting was written a bit tongue in cheek. But this writer, "Zentelligent," is absolutely wrong. He could not possibly be more wrong.
Still, I did mis-speak in that posting. Wing chun in practice is not about being an asshole. It's about being a bigger asshole than the guy you're fighting. (Both guys in a fight are already assholes.)
Wing chun is most certainly NOT about harmony and Zen Buddhism, as "Zentelligent" suggests.You know why? Because the term "martial art" is a misnomer. There's no art to wing chun. Art is subjective. Art is Renoir and Picasso, and who can definitively determine which is better?
Wing chun is a fighting method. A fascinating, sophisticated fighting method, and if I say "my wing chun is better than yours," and you disagree, we can settle it definitively with a fight. The person who can walk away wins the argument. There's no subjectivity involved.
You want harmony? Go to therapy. (I hear it can do wonders.) You want Zen Buddhism? Go see a monk. You only want to get fit? Go to a gym or do some yoga. Self-discipline? Join the Marines. Self-confidence? Grow a set.
Wing chun will teach you to fight. To hit the other guy as many times as you can, as fast as you can, and as hard as you can, until the other guy falls down, while simultaneously keeping the other guy from hitting you. That's it. That's all. It's that simple.
In truth, Zentelligent's response is typical of those who are destroying the purity and beauty of the "martial arts." I can't tell you how enraged I get every time some talkinghead media idiot writes that "X style of martial arts is not about fighting or self defense. It's about self confidence/respect/discipline." Blah blah blah.
Every martial art started out as a fighting method. A bunch of guys wanted to NOT get killed or beat up and came up with a method that they tested, and if it worked, they survived to pass it down. There's no philosophy involved. There's nothing deeper than that.
What I just said about wing chun holds true for all "martial arts." It's just that wing chun is more honest about fighting being all about being an asshole, to such an extent that it comes out in our tactics and techniques. Name a style, and I can point to a bloody, violent origin. Tai Chih was developed to kill raiders and bandits. Shaolin quan was developed because monks were tired of being robbed. Karate? A peasant-class response to tyranny. Escrima? So Filipinos could kill invading Spaniards. Even judo, which thinks of itself as not that warlike, was developed with combat in mind. The idea behind judo was that jujitsu had become ineffective because they just sat around talking about their theoretically deadly techniques that they couldn't actually practice in a "live" setting. (That stuff about self cultivation is just what they told the public to assuage the government and get taxpayer funding.)
And, on a personal note to "Zentelligent": real Zen masters don't need to talk about how enlightened they are.